School of Education
Instructional Web page

Teaching Diverse Populations 

EDG 2701

Religious Intolerance

J. McNair

Personal Information

Joseph D. McNair

Associate Professor, Senior

jmcnair@mdc.edu

Links

 

Course Syllabus

Introduction to the Lesson

The purpose of this eighth lesson in this second unit is to introduce the education student to the specific beliefs, values and attitudes rooted in fear and ignorance and are known collectively as Religious Intolerance. The student will study the overarching concepts of religious intolerance such as religious freedom, religious persecution, religious tolerance, religious intolerance including inter-faith intolerance, intra-faith intolerance, intolerance by from a faith group against a secular group; and intolerance by a secular group against a religious group.

Religious Freedom

The freedom of individuals to believe in, practice, and promote the religion of choice without (government) interference, harrassment, or other repercussions - as long as practices based on, or resulting from, those beliefs do not break the law (e.g. do not encourage or result in fraud, tax evasion, murder, terrorism, acts designed to undermine the government or the constitution, the use of unethical persuasion tactics, etcetera).

Religious Persecution

The practice of discouraging religious freedom and the freedom to express and/or promote all or certain religious beliefs - with repercussions ranging from discrimination and harassment to prevention and prosecution (by legal and/or illegal means). Does not cover legitimate legal measures designed to prevent and/or prosecute illegal practices such as fraud, tax evasion, murder, terrorism, acts designed to undermine the government or the constitution, the use of unethical persuasion tactics, etcetera.

Religious Tolerance

Acknowledging and supporting that individuals have the right and freedom to their own beliefs and related practices, without necessarily validating those beliefs or practices.

Religious Intolerance

Refusing to acknowledge and support the right of individuals to have their own beliefs and related practices. Also, the unwillingness to have one's own beliefs and related practices critically evaluated.

According to B.A. Robinson of Religious Tolerance. org:

Webster's New World Dictionary (1995) defines intolerant as:

"not tolerant; unwilling to tolerate other's opinions, beliefs, etc..."

Webster's defines tolerate in part as:

"to recognize and respect others' beliefs, practices etc. without sharing them"

Religious Tolerance.Org's working definition of religious intolerance is a combination of the above:

"not respecting the fundamental human right of other people to hold  religious beliefs that are different from your own."

Types of Religious Intolerance:

Religious intolerance can be divided into four types, depending upon the perpetrator and the intended target:

  • Inter-faith intolerance (e.g. a Hindu - Christian conflict)
  • Intra-faith intolerance (e.g. Shi'ite vs. Sunni Muslims)
  • Intolerance by from a faith group against a secular group (e.g. Christian Fundamentalists vs. the homosexual community)
  • Intolerance by a secular group against a religious group. (e.g. feminists vs. some organized religions)

A given instance of religious intolerance may be considered inter-faith by some groups and intra-faith by another. For example, many Fundamentalist Christians do not consider Roman Catholicism, the Mormon church, liberal Christian denominations, etc. to be part of Christianity. Thus, an attack by an Evangelical group on Roman Catholicism might be considered inter-faith by the Evangelical and intra-faith by a Roman Catholic.

The following actions may be considered examples of religious intolerance:

  • spreading misinformation about a group's beliefs or practices even though the inaccuracy of that information could have been easily checked and corrected;
  • spreading hatred about an entire group; e.g. stating or implying that all members of a group are evil, behave immorally, commit criminal acts, etc.;
  • ridiculing and belittling an entire faith group for their sincerely held beliefs and practices;
  • attempting to force religious beliefs and practices on others against their will;
  • restricting human rights of members of an identifiable religious group;
  • devaluing other faiths as worthless or evil.

A group may be defined as being any identifiable organization, or any subset of humanity as defined by their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, language, nationality, political beliefs, age, or economic status... erc.

What do religions teach?

Christianity's Golden Rule urges that we: "Treat others as you want them to treat you." (Luke 6:31).

Confucius said "Do not do to others what you do not want the others to do to you."

Hillel the Elder, the famous Jewish rabbi from the 1st century BCE and CE summed up the Torah with the expression "What is hateful to you, do not do to your friend."

Wiccans follow the Wiccan Rede which allows them to: "Do whatever you wish, as long as it harms nobody, including themselves."

Most other faith groups have similar rules of behavior.

Unfortunately, throughout history, we see examples of such rules being restricted to members of one's own religion. People of other faiths (and even those of other denominations in the same religion) are sometimes actively discriminated against. The most vicious civil disturbances and wars often have a religious basis (as in Northern Ireland, Bosnia, Kosovo, Middle East, Sudan, India, Sri Lanka, Philippines, and East Timor).

Religious intolerance in the Bible:

Jesus sometimes promoted religious tolerance of non-Jews by his words and actions. He is also recorded as having been severely intolerant of the religious beliefs and practices of Pharisees and Sadducees. There are many specific references in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament), by St. Paul, and by the author of Revelation which teach intolerance:

  • People who follow another faith are to be executed in organized acts of genocide.
  • Their Gods are said to be demons.
  • They themselves are described as unrighteous and unclean.
  • Their priests were murdered.
  • Christians are warned to not associate with them.

On the whole, the Bible promotes intolerance of other faiths. There are only a few passages which promote religious tolerance.

Religious intolerance among conservative Christians:

A few conservative Christians have made statements that categorize other religious groups as evil, degenerate, sub-human and/or hated by God. Some examples are:

  • A former Southern Baptist president told two large meetings recently that God does not listen to the prayers of Jews.
  • A Baptist minister in Texas has allegedly called for the mass murder of  Wiccans by napalm.
  • An Evangelical minister explained that there are two groups in the world: the children of God (those who are saved), and the children of the devil (everyone else).
  • Another stated that New Age beliefs are another attempt by Satan to pollute Christianity, promote immorality and foster unethical attitudes.
  • Still another stated that non-Christians hate God, love sin, and don't care whether anyone is struggling with sin or not.
  • A televangelist called for the round up and extermination of all Wiccans by the Federal government.
  • Buddhism, Hinduism and other Eastern religions have been described as variations of Satanism.

We have not been able to find any comparable statements by mainline or liberal Christians.

It is important to realize that many of these statements do not come from any mean spiritedness or hatred on the part of conservative Christians. They follow logically from their very specific theological view, and are a natural result of the way in which they interpret the Bible.

2 Timothy 3:16 states:

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, [and] for instruction in righteousness." (KJV)

Some conservative Christians who believe in the inerrancy of scripture cannot ignore the very plain and unambiguous messages in the Bible concerning the followers of other religions. They conclude that non-Christian religions are of Satan, and that the Gods of those faiths are in fact demonic spirits.

Most Fundamentalist and other Evangelical Christians believe that the only way to be saved is to repent of past sins and trust in Jesus as Lord and Savior. Many see non-Christians traveling down non-Christian spiritual paths that lead to an eternity of torture in Hell without any hope of mercy or relief. This includes two thirds of the human race, some four billion people. It is unreasonable to expect these Christians to be tolerant of religions that they believe generate so much evil, and which guide their followers to destruction.

We have been able to find only one large Evangelical Christian group which has a policy of promoting religious tolerance. That is Promise Keepers, a organization for men which encourages males of all faiths and races to join their rallies. "PK" has received a great deal of flak from other conservative Christian groups for those policies.

In summary, belief in the inerrancy of the Bible requires believers to reject the validity of other faiths.

Religious tolerance among liberal Christians:

Many liberal Christians have beliefs about other faiths that are quite different from the above. They regard non-Christian religions as valid, alternative paths to God. They often deviate from literal interpretations of Biblical passages. Many view the religiously intolerant sections of the Bible as no longer being of value in a today's multi-faith world. They give little weight to the concept of a Hell where unsaved people are punished for all eternity. By viewing all of the major religions of the world in a positive light, they find it much easier to be religiously tolerant. Thus, we find that groups which promote religious tolerance tend to come from mainline and liberal faith groups.

Religious intolerance in the media:

Most "faith bashing" in newspapers, radio and TV can be divided into four types:

1. Criticism of activities by people who are motivated by their religion to change society; for example, a Christian group might:

    • press for a revision to the "sex-ed" classes in the local school to remove references to contraception and STD prevention and substitute a chastity program
    • agitate to close an abortion clinic
    • take political action to restrict some family benefits to married couples

Here the media usually criticizes the actions of Christians but not their beliefs. Once any group attempts to change society lays itself open to criticism. The media's responsibility is to describe the group's actions in a balanced manner, giving all views equal and respectful treatment.

2. Ridicule or unbalanced treatment of religious leaders. A TV program might:

    • criticize a religious leader for financial misconduct
    • ridicule a televangelist for extra-marital sexual activity
    • seek to embarrass a minister for using manipulative techniques to increase donations
    • present a member of the clergy in a drama or situation comedy as a bumbling idiot, or incompetent professional, or person of low moral standards

It seems that the media often treats clergy and other religious leaders differently from other people. Some surveys show that perhaps 40% of men commit adultery. This is hardly news. However, when a religious leader does it, his/her moral lapse is given great exposure - even to being reviewed on international TV. This is unfair and unbalanced treatment.

3. Raw hatred and misinformation, typically directed by one religious leader against one or more religions such as:

    • asking the federal government to round up all members of a particular religion and exterminate them for their religious beliefs
    • stating that a minority religion is planning to exterminate all US Christian leaders
    • accusing, without evidence, a small religion of kidnapping, torturing and ritually killing tens of thousands of children per year in the U.S.

This type of faith bashing is in a class by itself:

    • It is typically based on misinformation knowingly spread by a religious leader against a small religion.
    • It often seeks to build up public hatred against a benign faith group. It can contribute to public hysteria that has led to lynching, attempted murder, firebombing etc.
    • The charges made are very serious, often involving criminal activity - even murder.
    • Proof of wrongdoing by the targeted religion is either totally absent, or typically consists of lurid headlines unsupported by hard evidence.

This form of faith bashing is a serious concern. It is a continuation into the 1990's of the types of hatred which fueled the Witch burnings of the Renaissance, the Spanish Inquisition, and the Nazi Holocaust.

4. Ridicule and criticism, by secular groups, typically directed at one or all religions such as:

    • implying that all religions are led by unethical leaders whose main goals are to dominate, manipulate and control their followers
    • ridiculing religious groups for their beliefs
    • Many such anti-religious groups exist on the Internet.

Religious intolerance outside North America:

In spite of UN declarations on religious freedom, there is still massive room for improvement in some countries.

Wars: Religious intolerance is a driving force behind many of the world's armed conflicts and centers of civil unrest. A few current and recent conflicts are listed below:

  • Protestants vs. Roman Catholics in Northern Ireland
  • Muslims, vs. Serbian Orthodox Christians in Kosovo
  • Christians, Jews, and Muslims in the Middle East
  • Aboriginals, Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs in India
  • Christians and Muslims in East Timor
  • Christians and Muslims and Animists in Nigeria
  • Christians and Muslims in the southern Philippine islands
  • Hindus and Buddhists in Sri Lanka
  • Christians and Muslims in Sudan

Missionaries: Religious missionaries are severely persecuted in some areas of the world. Most victims are Christians; most perpetrators are federal governments.

Conversion: Some countries have declared that a religious conversion from the state religion to another belief system is a criminal act, sometimes punishable by death. These laws appear to be most frequently found in Muslim countries.

Overview: Robert Seiple of the U.S. State Department reported to a congressional hearing on 1999-OCT-6 on religious freedom around the world. Unfortunately, the report did not include religious abuses inside the U.S. They found that seven countries exhibited "particularly severe" violations of religious freedom over the last year:

Afghanistan's previous government, led by the Taliban, persecuted and killed Shiite Muslims in programs of mass murder that meet some definitions of genocide. The police often impose "severe physical punishment and imprisonment for deviations from codes of worship and dress.

Myanmar (Burma) has imprisoned Buddhist monks who promote human and political rights.

China suppresses unregistered religious activity "through harassment, prolonged detention and incarceration in prison or 'reform-through-labor' camps."

Iran seriously persecutes the Baha'i World Faith by imprisonment of its members, denial of the right to assemble, and confiscating or desecrating their holy places.

Iraq arbitrarily imprisons, and murders some individuals from their Shi'a Muslim minority.

Serbia's government (primarily composed of Serbian Orthodox Christians) killed, tortured, raped and forced the emigration of ethnic Albanians (mostly Muslims) in Kosovar.

Sudan 's government has engaged in killing, arbitrary imprisonment, violence, and forced conversions of members of minority faiths, including Christianity, Aboriginal religions, and minority Muslim groups.

The Religious Freedom Act requires the President to react to this report by selecting "from 15 policy responses that range from private diplomatic protest to economic sanctions." 

Religious intolerance in North America:

The wall of separation between church and state does not prevent judges and legislators from attempting to eliminate the rights of faith groups that they do not like:

In 1986, Senator Jessie Helms (R, NC) introduced a bill in Congress to remove tax exempt status from existing Wiccan groups and prevent any new groups from being recognized. It never made it out of committee.

Family court judges in the U.S. and Canada occasionally discriminate in custody matters against the parent of minority, high demand faith groups, such as Jehovah's Witnesses.

Various attempts have been made to modify the constitution in order to permit prayer in the public schools. This would have students recite prayers of the dominant religion. Students who follow minority religions would be given the options of either violating their own beliefs or risk later harassment and violence from other students.

Society has made much progress in the past few decades:

  • With the repeal of oppressive laws, Native Americans are now able to conduct their traditional ceremonies
  • The exclusion of Jews from membership in golf clubs and similar organizations is much less common than in the past.
  • A person no longer has to believe in the existence of a personal deity in order to be a conscientious objector to military service. (However, the Canadian government only extends charitable status to religious groups if they teach a belief in a God.)
  • Some local ministerial organizations now include non-Christians.
  • J.F. Kennedy became the first Roman Catholic President of the US. The religious faith of the Prime Minister of Canada seems to be of little interest to anyone. (We suspect he is a Roman Catholic).
  • Ritual consumption of peyote during some Native American rituals is permitted.
  • Native Elders are now generally given the same rights as Christian and Jewish clergy during prison visits
  • Roman Catholic children are no longer taught that Protestants will go to eternal punishment in hell when they die; most Protestant children are no longer told that all Roman Catholics will go to hell.

The constitutions of the US and Canada guarantee religious freedom to all citizens, yet many hurdles remain to be overcome:

  • Atheists are denied certain fundamental rights in some States
  • Children are occasionally seized from homes because of some social workers' misunderstanding of their parents' religion.
  • Parents are denied access to their children because of some judges' beliefs about the parents' faith.
  • Leaders of some faith groups (e.g. Neopagan) are not recognized as clergy during prison visitation
  • Some faith groups are not allowed to perform marriages. A common method of exclusion is for state or provincial governments to require the group to have been in existence for long periods before their clergy can marry people.
  • The Socialist premier of the province of British Columbia in Canada refused on religious grounds to authorize election papers for a candidate nominated for the Provincial Legislature. Threatened with a lawsuit that he could not possibly win, he apologized for his act of bigotry.
  • Followers of certain faiths are only able to celebrate their rituals safely in certain areas of North America. They fear persecution and attacks by Christians who misunderstand their gentle, earth based faith. These include Wiccans, Druids, and other Neopagans. Much of this hatred is based upon a beliefs held over from the Middle Ages.
  • Representative Barr and a coalition of about a dozen conservative Christian agencies are promoting a boycott of the U.S. army in an effort to terminate the religious freedoms of Neopagans.

Religious tolerance does not seem to be heavily promoted in North America. Although there are untold numbers of:

  • anti-racism Web sites devoted to racial harmony and tolerance,
  • anti-sexism Web sites devoted to equal rights for women,
  • anti-homophobia Web sites devoted to equal rights for gays, lesbians and bisexuals,

Some random examples of intolerance:

A few more detailed examples might be useful. The following are not presented as a complete or balanced list. Rather, it consists of just a few examples that we have stumbled across:

Television: This is a major source of intolerance. Vision TV's Mosaic service in Canada features "paid time programs from a variety of faith groups and broadcast ministries". Because Vision broadcasts programs from all types of religions and faith groups, one can differentiate between those groups which are relatively free from hatred and misinformation from those which often exhibit intolerance. We have been given access to data collected by the Wiccan Information Network's Ontario Coordinator. He found that of approximately 35 episodes in the mid 1990's that included vicious religious intolerance:

  • 3% originated from a non-Christian program (An Islamic program targeting secularists)
  • 0% originated from main-line or liberal Christian programs
  • 97% originated from Evangelical or Fundamentalist Christian programs. Targets were (in decreasing order of frequency) followers of non-Christian religions, homosexuals, followers of non-Evangelical Christian religions, political liberals, working mothers, etc.

Some of this intolerance is quite repulsive, and included:

  • a call for the Federal Government to exterminate all followers of a specific faith group
  • a statement that the leaders of a certain religion were plotting to kill all of Christian leaders in America
  • a statement that it is the goal of Islam to give all Americans two choices: to convert immediately to their religion or have your head chopped off that followers of a particular faith group routinely torture and kill babies, and commit other unspeakable crimes.

We find this result to be curious and self-defeating for conservative Christians. On one hand, they are committed to fulfilling the Great Commission which is to preach the Gospel to all the world. At the same time, they are broadcasting so much hatred against various groups that many "non-believers" are becoming resistant to the message. 

A government regulatory body renewed Vision's license in the expectation that they would reduce the amount of religious bigotry on its network. They seem to have cleaned up their act in recent years.

Religious Books:

After consulting the records of the Wiccan Information Network's Ontario Coordinator found that:

  • Religious dictionaries by main-line and liberal Christian authors contain some errors when referring to Neopagan religions. However, these appear to be honest mistakes and were caused by lack of familiarity with those faiths. 100% of the authors responded to letters sent to them which explained their errors.
  • Books by conservative Christian authors about Neopagan religions were heavily biased, and contained a great deal of misinformation. All of the reviewed books that described personal involvement by the authors with Satanic groups were clearly hoaxes. Presented as a documentary expose of real events, they were clearly works of fiction. 5% of these authors responded to letters sent to them.

Desecration of Cultural and Religious Heritage A photographer was traveling through the four corners region in the US. This is the area where Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona and Utah meet. He came across a troop of Boy Scouts with hammers and chisels who were defacing centuries-old native petroglyphs (rock carvings) on a rock face. The horrified photographer asked the troop leader why they were destroying priceless native history. The leader replied that the Mormon church taught that the petroglyphs were Pagan symbols of Satanic origin. They felt that it was their religious duty to eliminate them for all time.

Note: This action was a violation of the behavioral rules of the Boy Scouts Association rules and of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. The example is not meant to criticize either organization, but was intended to show how members of groups misinterpret the rules of their own groups.

Attacks on Religious Leaders Singer Sinead O'Connor appeared on "Saturday Night Live" on 1992-OCT-3, and sang a protest song which implied that victims of racism, child abuse and other forms of victimization have a legitimate right to fight back by any means, including war. At the end of the song, she held up a photograph of Pope John II. She tore it into pieces, saying "Fight the real enemy."

This lesson was developed to address elements of competency #2,#3, #4 and #5 on the functions of the educational process (teaching and learning) and schooling for education majors who are taking EDG 2701 in partial fulfillment of the graduation requirements for an Associate of Arts degree in Teaching (Elementary), Teaching (Secondary), Early Childhood and Exceptional Education.

Competency #2 reads (in part) as follows:

The student will examine the impact of diversity upon the educational process by

Defining the past and present roles of education in a multicultural society.

Comparing and contrasting the essential elements of a culturally competent educator.

Describing the functions of schooling in America.

Competency #3 reads (in part) as follows:

The student will examine barriers to understanding diversity by

Reviewing one's own viewpoint and value system, and compare and contrast these with the viewpoints and values of others from diverse backgrounds.

Defining the concept of a cultural filter and explain how it affects the way a person or a group perceives reality.

Examining barriers to cultural understanding such as the concept and use of intelligence tests, assessment of student achievement, teacher biases, tracking of students, etc.

Competency #4 reads (in part) as follows:

 The student will examine the structure and complexity of diversity by

Describing the influence of diversity on interpretation of course content.

Reviewing schemata for learning about any culture.

Identify the unifying beliefs, values, and attitudes shared by groups and individuals in America.

Competency #5 reads (in part) as follows:

The student will have the opportunity to develop intercultural competence and cultural relativism by

Analyzing situations through multiple cultural perspectives.

Discussing the barriers that lead to an unwillingness and/or inability to view reality from another point of view.

Learning and practicing techniques to gain insight into other cultures and to foster personal transformation.

(A complete list of all the competencies for EDG 2701 is provided below by clicking on the link en titled competencies)

NEXT PAGE