Miami Dade College
Gordon Rule Writing Rubric
Spring 2007
|
|
Demonstrates Emerging College-Level Writing 1 |
Demonstrates Satisfactory College-Level Writing 2 |
Demonstrates Proficient College-Level Writing 3 |
Demonstrates Exemplary College-Level Writing 4 |
|
Addresses Purpose and Audience |
Wavers in purpose.
Incompletely addresses assigned topic or directions.
Shows need for more study of issues.
Style uneven. |
Adheres to purpose, fulfills assignment.
Shows adequate understanding of key issues.
Style generally appropriate to intended audience. |
Communicates purpose clearly.
Shows full understanding of issues.
Style consistently effective for intended audience. |
Communicates purpose with sophistication.
Beyond understanding of issues, shows insight.
Style engages audience, writer’s credibility. |
|
|
Demonstrates Emerging College-Level Writing 1 |
Demonstrates Satisfactory College-Level Writing 2 |
Demonstrates Proficient College-Level Writing 3 |
Demonstrates Exemplary College-Level Writing 4 |
|
Demonstrates Effective Organization of Content |
Loose focus on central idea.
Contains some repetition and digression.
Paragraph structure weak. |
Central idea evident.
Paragraph structure sometimes supports content.
Consistency, logic and transitions show some weaknesses. |
Central idea clear.
Paragraph structure uniformly supports content.
Consistency, logic and transitions well managed. |
Central idea clear.
Paragraph structure consistently and effectively supports content.
Clear logic and effective transitions. |
|
|
Demonstrates Emerging College-Level Writing 1 |
Demonstrates Satisfactory College-Level Writing 2 |
Demonstrates Proficient College-Level Writing 3 |
Demonstrates Exemplary College-Level Writing 4 |
|
Demonstrates Effective Development: Thesis Statement, Main Points, Supporting Information, Conclusion |
Thesis evident but support very general and/or inconsistent.
Several factual errors. |
Thesis evident but supported by a mixture of generalizations and specific detail.
Some factual errors. |
Thesis, stated or implied.
Presents a plan of development that is carried out.
Effective supporting details.
Consistent development.
No factual errors. |
Stated or implied thesis developed logically, coherently, and extensively with convincing, specific supporting details.
Strong evidence of critical thinking.
No factual errors. |
|
|
Demonstrates Emerging College-Level Writing 1 |
Demonstrates Satisfactory College-Level Writing 2 |
Demonstrates Proficient College-Level Writing 3 |
Demonstrates Exemplary College-Level Writing 4 |
|
Employs Effective Language |
Frequent errors in word choice.
Sentence structure and mechanics seriously affect clarity. |
Word choice correct but simple/without variety.
Errors in mechanics and/or usage do not obscure content of assignment. |
Word choice accurate, varied.
Occasional errors in sentence structure.
Usage and mechanics do not hinder writer’s ability to communicate purpose. |
Choice of language consistently precise, purposeful.
Nearly flawless sentence structure.
Usage, mechanics contribute to writer’s ability to communicate purpose. |